Monday 28 May 2012

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Recent Posts

Blogger Tricks

Blogger Themes

Download

 

Thursday 21 July 2011

Domain ownership

"This post confirms my ownership of the site and that this site adheres to Google AdSense
program policies and Terms and Conditions: ca-pub-4965972780582001"

Wednesday 6 April 2011

Imran Khan wants Shahid Afridi to lead Pakistan in Test cricket as well

Imran Khan wants Shahid Afridi to lead Pakistan in Test cricket as well – Cricket News


Former Pakistan captain Imran Khan has said that Shahid Khan Afridi should be the captain of the national team in all the three formats of the game.
Afridi announced his retirement from Test cricket during the series against Australia in England last year after Pakistan lost the first Test at Lords and he flew back home. However, the Men in Green went on to level the series in the next match under the captaincy of Salman Butt.
Imran wants Afridi to take back his retirement from the longer version of the game and lead his country in limited overs as well as Test cricket.
The legendary cricketer and one of the best all-rounders of the history of the sport feels that there should be one man leading his country in all the three formats and that is the key behind India’s success in the recently concluded ICC World Cup 2011.
He said, “There should be just one captain for all three formats of the game. The main reason for India winning the World Cup is that their captain, Mahendra Singh Dhoni leads them in Tests, ODIs and T20 cricket."
It is notable that Pakistan has done well in Test cricket recently without their limited overs captain as they squared the series against top Test teams like Australia and South Africa last year on neutral territory and went on to beat New Zealand by 1-0 on their home soil.
Imran who led his country to the World Cup triumph back in 1992 believes that no captain can excel in cricket without playing all the formats of the game.
"Afridi must also be captain in all three formats of the sport. My belief is that unless you captain in Test cricket you can't really be at the top of your game," Imran added.
Pakistan’s limited overs captain who is known for his flamboyant style of cricket has always been rated as a specialist of the shorter format of the game, although he has played Test cricket off and on. His case for Test cricket is not strong anymore considering the recent success Misbah-ul-Haq has tasted as Pakistan’s captain in the longer version of the game. 

Cricket World Cup 2011: review, experts’ verdict, team of tournament and changes for 2015

Michael Vaughan
Player of the tournament
Yuvraj Singh... His batting and bowling were both crucial to India’s success. His calmness at the crease took them home in tight situations. He made 362 runs at an average of 90 and took 15 wickets. Only Zaheer Khan, Tim Southee and Shahid Afridi managed more victims.
Match of the tournament
India v England... England’s tie with India was a fantastic game of 50-over cricket that ebbed and flowed. Both sides left the ground feeling that they could and should have won.
Most memorable moment
Dhoni's winning six... A great way to end the final and a shot that will live forever in the memory of India’s fans. Dhoni had played the perfect captain’s innings.
Biggest disappointment
England losing to Ireland... But you have got to give Kevin O’Brien a huge amount of credit for his century. I never would have thought that England would lose to Ireland in a World Cup game.
What should be changed for 2015?
Shorter tournament... The World Cup is still too long with too many mismatches. Fewer teams and a shorter event in four years’ time will show that the lessons have been learned.
Team of the tournament
1 Tillakaratne Dilshan
2 Sachin Tendulkar
3 Kumar Sangakkara
4 Mahela Jayawardene
5 Yuvraj Singh
6 *†Mahendra Singh Dhoni
7 Shahid Afridi
8 Angelo Mathews
9 Muttiah Muralitharan
10 Zaheer Khan
11 Lasith Malinga

Derek Pringle
Player of the tournament
Yuvraj Singh... Did not play huge roles in the final or semi, but his batting was decisive before that. His bowling was more than handy, too – although perceived as the weak link in India’s attack he proved to be anything but.
Match of the tournament
The final... England had a thrilling tie with India in the group stage but the home side’s final against Sri Lanka, when they chased almost 50 runs more than had ever been successfully chased before at the Wankhede stadium, was the thrilling conclusion a meandering tournament needed.
Most memorable moment
Dhoni’s 91... If fate was an aesthete, Mahela Jayawardene’s hundred in the final would have clinched a win for Sri Lanka. Instead, it was MS Dhoni’s brilliant captain’s innings of 91 that sealed the destiny of the World Cup to mass ecstasy. A narrow win then, for substance over style.
Biggest disappointment
England’s exit... Andrew Strauss’s team knew what to expect in terms of the conditions in Colombo and their opponents, Sri Lanka, but seemed unable to do anything about either. A meek exit exacerbated by tiredness from a tough but rewarding Ashes tour to Australia.
What should be changed for 2015?
Teams and tickets... The early stages dragged on, something the ICC has promised to address for 2015, with just 10 teams. But to encourage minnows who have shown progress, like Ireland, the bottom two full- member countries in the one-day rankings should play a quadrangular qualifier against the top two associate sides. Also more tickets need to be available to the public.
Team of the tournament
1 Virender Sehwag
2 Sachin Tendulkar
3 Kumar Sangakkara
4 Mahela Jayawardene
5 Yuvraj Singh
6 Tillakaratne Dilshan
7 *†MS Dhoni
8 Shahid Afridi
9 Dale Steyn
10 Lasith Malinga
11 Saeed Ajmal

Scyld Berry
Player of the tournament
Yuvraj Singh... India were favourites due to their batting and part-time spin, and Yuvraj not only batted well, but also he became a full-time spinner.
Match of the tournament
The Final... was as good as any World Cup final there has been, because of the ebbing and flowing, and it was certainly the best since the first – West Indies v Australia at Lord’s – in 1975. It was very well organised too.
Most memorable moment
India v Pakistan... One television commentator dismissed the India v Pakistan semi-final as just a game of cricket, but it was not. It held up a mirror to the two peoples and showed them just how close – ­governments aside – they still are.
Biggest disappointment
The format... Two qualifying groups of seven would have been fine if there had only been semi-finals and no quarter-finals. Then the qualifying games would have mattered – even beating up minnows to boost your run-rate in case you finished level on points.
What should be changed for 2015?
Ten countries... play each other once, then first v fourth and second v third, as in 1992. A country to play one game every four days, and very few venues to reduce travel as well as length of the tournament.
Team of the tournament
1 Tillakaratne Dilshan
2 Sachin Tendulkar
3 Kumar Sangakkara
4 Jacques Kallis
5 Yuvraj Singh
6 *†MS Dhoni
7 Kevin O’Brien
8 Brett Lee
9 Zaheer Kahn
10 Graeme Swann
11 Lasith Malinga

Nick Hoult
Player of the tournament
Sachin Tendulkar... Tillakaratne Dilshan scored more runs but nobody had to handle a nation’s expectation like Tendulkar. His hundred against England was a wonderfully constructed innings and it was fitting that India dedicated their win in the final to him.
Match of the tournament
India v England... Has to be India against England in Bangalore. It fluctuated wildly and England should have won. If they had managed one more run it could have been a different World Cup for them.
Most memorable moment
Ajmal Shahzad’s six... It was a double-take moment. An England No10 had just hit a straight six off his first ball under enormous pressure as England tied with India.
Biggest disappointment... England’s defeat by bangladesh. The game in Chittagong felt like an exercise in self-pity. The dew made it hard for them but they made a poor Bangladesh side look like genuine quarter-final contenders, which they clearly were not.
What should be changed for 2015?
England fit for purpose... The tournament was a bit like the England football team being asked to play in the European Championship weeks after winning the World Cup. But tiredness only covers up so much. It was a poorly selected squad by a management that is normally so consistent.
Team of the tournament
1 Virender Sehwag
2 Sachin Tendulkar
3 Jonathan Trott
4 *†Kumar Sangakkara
5 Mahela Jayawardene
6 Angelo Mathews
7 Yuvraj Singh
8 Shahid Afridi
9 Tim Southee
10 Zaheer Kahn
11 Muttiah Muralitharan

Simon Briggs
Player of the tournament
Zaheer Khan... Zaheer and Yuvraj Singh made their international debuts in the same match, at the start of the 2000 Champions Trophy. And if Yuvraj was the outstanding batsman of this tournament, Zaheer was the most consistent bowler.
Match of the tournament
England v West Indies... What an illogical, counter-intuitive and totally compelling match. The West Indies hit some ridiculous shots, turned their batting order upside down, and caved in horribly just when victory seemed theirs.
Most memorable moment
Dhoni's winning shot... I think we might be hearing a bit more about MS Dhoni’s grand finale – that cleanly struck six back over the bowler’s head to finish the tournament on a high. The man has style.
Biggest disappointment
Bangladesh... were always going to struggle to qualify for the quarter-finals, but to be bowled out for 58 and 78 in two of their games was abject. They clearly need a lesson in crease-occupation from Mr Boycott.
What should be changed for 2015?
No gimmicks... No more of that horrible flute motif that seems to come on every 15 minutes - it’s more annoying than the mariachi trumpet thing. Mind you, as 2015 will be staged Down Under, we’ll probably get a didgeridoo.
Team of the tournament
1 Tillakaratne Dilshan
2 Sachin Tendulkar
3 *†Kumar Sangakkara
4 Yuvraj Singh
5 AB de Villiers
6 Suresh Raina
7 Kieron Pollard
8 Shahid Afridi
9 Lasith Malinga
10 Zaheer Khan
11 Tim Southee

Warne puts his hand up for India job?

According to reports, former Australian spinner Shane Warne on Wednesday suggested that he'd vie for the position of Indian coach if afforded the opportunity, as the World Cup-winning nation search for a successor to Gary Kirsten.
Having announced earlier in the year that he would renew his contract with the BCCI after the ODI showpiece, former South African batsman Kirsten brought to a triumphant end to his role as head coach of the sub-continental big guns with victory over Sri Lanka in Saturday's final in Mumbai.
"It is a very difficult job to be India coach, it is never easy," Warne was quoted as saying in the Mail Today.
"But with India doing so well, it is a lot easier to take over right now than it has been in the past. I'll enjoy working with the Indian cricket team for sure.
"Kirsten is a quality person and it would be hard to find a replacement for him. Under him, the Indian team has reached the number one spot in Tests and won the World Cup.
"He is a fantastic coach."
Warne finished his international career in 2007 and has since, among other off-field exploits, captained and coached the Rajasthan Royals across three editions of the Twenty20 Indian Premier League, the first of which saw the Jaipur-bred franchise claim the title under the animated Australian's leadership.

Jayawardene, selection committee resign

Sri Lankan Cricket's week of turmoil continued on Wednesday as vice-captain Mahela Jayawardene and the entire selection committee, headed by chief selector Aravinda de Silva, handed in their resignations. This after Kumar Sangakkara had on Tuesday quit the ODI and Twenty20 captaincy and outlined his plans to eventually relinquish the Test helm.
The term of de Silva and fellow committee members Ranjith Fernando, Amal Silva and Azwer Ali was due to end on April 30, but their choice to collectively step down in advance, according to their statement, comes as a means for "the new selection committee "an opportunity to make short- and long- term plans, in the way they think is best for our cricket."
Just four days after Sri Lanka's World Cup final loss to India, de Silva wrote in his resignation letter: "When we took over our assignment, our broad goal was always to hand over Sri Lankan cricket in better shape than when we took over.
"While like everyone else associated with SLC, we are also enormously disappointed at not being able to annex the coveted World Cup, which was lost to India in a highly competitive final, we are happy we have been able to meet most of our objectives in a very short space of time."
Whereas Jayawardene was entirely brief in the reason behind his resignation, merely stating "it is time to move on, give the reins to someone younger in the team," SLC secretary Nishanta Ranatunga clarified that de Silva and company are "willing to serve again as long as they are appointed.
"But in the absence of a captain or a vice-captain they felt that the minister should handle the selections and they have given him the opportunity to do so. They have left it now for the minister to take a call on their resignation."
Sangakkara's shock decision leaves Tillakaratne Dilshan and Angelo Mathews vying for the captaincy, with the new captain set to lead his side through a busy season, which includes daunting tours to Australia and England.
Meanwhile, former Australian batsman Stuart Law has been appointed as Sri Lanka's interim coach for the tour of England next month.
Law had assisted outgoing head coach Trevor Bayliss, who announced earlier in the year that he would step down after the World Cup, since late 2009 and is tipped to eventually take the post on a full-time basis.

ICC up the creek and without a paddle

Nobody can deny that there were a handful of incredibly one-sided games in the 2011 World Cup - the scorecards don't lie. Using the same form of measurement, though, one can also see that there were some absolute crackers, a few of which involved the likeable folk from Ireland.
William Porterfield's men quickly became fan favourites at the event, but those fans better commit Kevin O'Brien's assault against England, George Dockrell's magic and a general sense of enthusiasm and dedication to their long-term memories because they won't be seeing those players at the game's showpiece event for at least eight years; and that is simply unacceptable.
Ireland's reaction to the ICC's decision to limit participation in the 2015 World Cup to the 10 Member nations has been understandably strong. Coach Phil Simmons described it as "despicable", suggesting that the game had been "pulled back by 10 years," while Ireland Cricket's chief executive Warren Deutrom called it a "black day for the sport". To skipper William Porterfield, it's simply "a joke".
Their sentiments are hard to disagree with, and they certainly can't be repelled with logic. As Simmons pointed out, Ireland are in the top 10 in the rankings, they pull in the fans and have the skills to back it up. More curiously, however, one can't call on the ICC's reasoning to defend the decision because, since Monday's board meeting in Mumbai, they haven't offered any.
Chief executive Haroon Lorgat has mentioned in the past that the Associates will be included in the World Twenty20, as the ICC view this as a better arena in which the minnows can improve their skills. Quite a ridiculous comment, really, when the prominent school of thought sees Twenty20 Internationals requiring a different skill set to long forms of the game, and certainly not one that will enhance play in the Test arena every team's ultimate goal.
Since the commercial disaster that was the 2007 World Cup there have been rumblings that the ICC simply cannot afford to take the chance that major upsets will occur as they did in the Caribbean, with India and Pakistan crashing out in the group stages. If this is the case, the least the ICC can do is come out and say it, rather than hiding behind a cowardly wall of silence.
Perhaps the most perplexing point is why have the ICC reduced the tournament by four? By limiting the number of teams to 12 rather than the 10 that has been decided on, one allows the top Associates to have their day in the sun, and the bigger nations have a one-in-three chance of making the semi-finals. The chances of two of the big guns losing out on those odds is slim.
Speaking in the run-up to the World Cup, Ed Joyce, once of Ireland, then of England and now again with Ireland, told Cricket365 that if the game was to really grow in Ireland, players needed to be presented with a realistic choice, a firm reason for staying in Ireland.
The ICC have now made the choice for this generation of Irish players. Dockrell now looks certain to turn out for England in the future, and you can't really blame him.
Even more horrifying is that if the decision has such drastic consequences for the Ireland, who are seen as being on the cusp of Test-playing status, what will it do to even smaller nations? What do the Kenya and Canada have to play for? Should Bermuda and Afghanistan just throw in the towel now? Madness.
Asked whether he would like to see the Associates at future World Cups, England's Graeme Swann replied: "Why would you want to take the world out of the World Cup?"
It seems that neither the players nor fans would want to. The ICC are alone on this one.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More